product
4105308Knowing and the Mystique of Logic and Ruleshttps://www.gandhi.com.mx/knowing-and-the-mystique-of-logic-and-rules-9789401585491/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/2589659/42e4284e-cde6-4489-99c2-162a808d5ee4.jpg?v=63838418113833000027323036MXNSpringer NetherlandsInStock/Ebooks/<p>Human knowing is examined as it emerges from classical empirical psychology, with its ramifications into language, computing, science, and scholarship. While the discussion takes empirical support from a wide range, claims for the significance of logic and rules are challenged throughout. Highlights of the discussion:</p><ul><li>knowing is a matter of habits or dispositions that guide the persons stream of consciousness;</li><li>rules of language have no significance in language production and understanding, being descriptions of linguistic styles;</li><li>statements that may be true or false enter into ordinary linguistic activity, not as elements of messages, but merely as summaries of situations, with a view to action;</li><li>in computer programming the significance of logic, proof, and formalized description, is incidental and subject to the programmers personality;</li><li>analysis of computer modelling of the mental activity shows that in describing human knowing the computer is irrelevant;</li><li>in accounting for the scholarly/scientific activity, logic and rules are impotent;</li><li>a novel theory: scholarship and science have coherent descriptions as their core.</li></ul><p>The discussion addresses questions that are basic to advanced applications of computers and to students of language and science.</p>...4041385Knowing and the Mystique of Logic and Rules27323036https://www.gandhi.com.mx/knowing-and-the-mystique-of-logic-and-rules-9789401585491/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/2589659/42e4284e-cde6-4489-99c2-162a808d5ee4.jpg?v=638384181138330000InStockMXN99999DIEbook20139789401585491_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_<p>Human knowing is examined as it emerges from classical empirical psychology, with its ramifications into language, computing, science, and scholarship. While the discussion takes empirical support from a wide range, claims for the significance of logic and rules are challenged throughout. Highlights of the discussion:</p><ul><li>knowing is a matter of habits or dispositions that guide the persons stream of consciousness;</li><li>rules of language have no significance in language production and understanding, being descriptions of linguistic styles;</li><li>statements that may be true or false enter into ordinary linguistic activity, not as elements of messages, but merely as summaries of situations, with a view to action;</li><li>in computer programming the significance of logic, proof, and formalized description, is incidental and subject to the programmers personality;</li><li>analysis of computer modelling of the mental activity shows that in describing human knowing the computer is irrelevant;</li><li>in accounting for the scholarly/scientific activity, logic and rules are impotent;</li><li>a novel theory: scholarship and science have coherent descriptions as their core.</li></ul><p>The discussion addresses questions that are basic to advanced applications of computers and to students of language and science.</p>(*_*)9789401585491_<p>Human knowing is examined as it emerges from classical empirical psychology, with its ramifications into language, computing, science, and scholarship. While the discussion takes empirical support from a wide range, claims for the significance of logic and rules are challenged throughout. Highlights of the discussion:</p><ul><li>knowing is a matter of habits or dispositions that guide the persons stream of consciousness;</li><li>rules of language have no significance in language production and understanding, being descriptions of linguistic styles;</li><li>statements that may be true or false enter into ordinary linguistic activity, not as elements of messages, but merely as summaries of situations, with a view to action;</li><li>in computer programming the significance of logic, proof, and formalized description, is incidental and subject to the programmers personality;</li><li>analysis of computer modelling of the mental activity shows that in describing human knowing the computer is irrelevant;</li><li>in accounting for the scholarly/scientific activity, logic and rules are impotent;</li><li>a novel theory: scholarship and science have coherent descriptions as their core.</li></ul><p>The discussion addresses questions that are basic to advanced applications of computers and to students of language and science.</p>...9789401585491_Springer Netherlandslibro_electonico_ac734f8c-5c4a-375c-b215-aa062f7f916a_9789401585491;9789401585491_9789401585491P. NaurInglésMéxico2013-03-14T00:00:00+00:00Springer Netherlands