Envío gratis siempre a todo México.
Haz clic para hacer zoom
Not Available
MfonAbasi Okon
A CRITIQUE OF KARL RAYMOND POPPERS FALSIFICATION PRINCIPLE
Cargando comentarios…
Comparte
$61
Envío gratis siempre
Comentarios
Cargando el resumen…
Cargando comentarios…
product
1738601A CRITIQUE OF KARL RAYMOND POPPERS FALSIFICATION PRINCIPLEhttps://www.gandhi.com.mx/a-critique-of-karl-raymond-poppers-falsification-principle/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/311284/234a3bcd-737c-4619-9f15-ae7805f18e5d.jpg?v=6383342005973700006161MXNMfonAbasi OkonInStock/Ebooks/<p>ABSTRACT</p><p>The study, A Critique of Karl Raymond Poppers Falsification Principle examined Karl Poppers falsification principle which Karl popper was concerned with distinguishing science from pseudo-science; as well as a criterion of truth in science; and consequently his rejection of the verifiability principle of meaning since it does not adequately demarcate scientific statements, including majorly metaphysical, ethical and theological statements and this lead to his formulation of the falsifiability theory. Popper summits that the more a theory is falsified, the more it becomes scientific. By this, every scientific theory must be such that it can be refuted. This position is founded upon Poppers quest to demarcate science from pseudo-science. The main objective of this study was to carry out a critique of Karl Poppers falsification principle. The study aims at re-examining the method arriving at scientific truth, the problem that are inherent in it and why popper debunked it and opted for a better method or theory. The research method adopted in this research include, the expository, analytic and critical methods. The study conducts a survey of the extant literature to understand the concept, the methodology as suggested by Popper to operationalize the concept, and possible limitations, both conceptual and methodological. The extant literature points out inherent ambiguities in the Popperian concept of falsifiabilty. One recurring theme is that Popper, the deductivist, uses the much critiqued inductivistic method among his methodological suite.</p><p>Keywords: Falsification, Popper, Falsifiability, Verisimilitude</p>...1710918A CRITIQUE OF KARL RAYMOND POPPERS FALSIFICATION PRINCIPLE6161https://www.gandhi.com.mx/a-critique-of-karl-raymond-poppers-falsification-principle/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/311284/234a3bcd-737c-4619-9f15-ae7805f18e5d.jpg?v=638334200597370000InStockMXN99999DIEbook20221230005740147_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_<p>ABSTRACT</p><p>The study, A Critique of Karl Raymond Poppers Falsification Principle examined Karl Poppers falsification principle which Karl popper was concerned with distinguishing science from pseudo-science; as well as a criterion of truth in science; and consequently his rejection of the verifiability principle of meaning since it does not adequately demarcate scientific statements, including majorly metaphysical, ethical and theological statements and this lead to his formulation of the falsifiability theory. Popper summits that the more a theory is falsified, the more it becomes scientific. By this, every scientific theory must be such that it can be refuted. This position is founded upon Poppers quest to demarcate science from pseudo-science. The main objective of this study was to carry out a critique of Karl Poppers falsification principle. The study aims at re-examining the method arriving at scientific truth, the problem that are inherent in it and why popper debunked it and opted for a better method or theory. The research method adopted in this research include, the expository, analytic and critical methods. The study conducts a survey of the extant literature to understand the concept, the methodology as suggested by Popper to operationalize the concept, and possible limitations, both conceptual and methodological. The extant literature points out inherent ambiguities in the Popperian concept of falsifiabilty. One recurring theme is that Popper, the deductivist, uses the much critiqued inductivistic method among his methodological suite.</p><p>Keywords: Falsification, Popper, Falsifiability, Verisimilitude</p>...1230005740147_MfonAbasi Okonlibro_electonico_a49f9be3-6984-32bf-af09-01f7d8777a62_1230005740147;1230005740147_1230005740147MfonAbasi OkonInglésMéxicohttps://getbook.kobo.com/koboid-prod-public/c1ff56e3-ef0a-48dd-95b9-07ff0332a531-epub-86dd7e7e-1fff-47ba-8566-838e78041b11.epub2022-09-02T00:00:00+00:00MfonAbasi Okon