Envío gratis siempre a todo México.
Haz clic para hacer zoom
Not Available
Razie Mah
Comments on Mansoureh Tajiks Articles (2020) "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shia Islam"
Cargando comentarios…
Comparte
$39
Envío gratis siempre
Comentarios
Cargando el resumen…
Cargando comentarios…
product
1604443Comments on Mansoureh Tajiks Articles (2020) "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shia Islam"https://www.gandhi.com.mx/comments-on-mansoureh-tajik-s-articles-2020-understanding-the-concepts-of-imamat-and-wilayat-in-shi-a-islam-1/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/629281/63d2203f-cb39-47f6-a829-99144d2e12bf.jpg?v=6383355713713000003939MXNRazie MahInStock/Ebooks/<p>Mansoureh Tajik is a Shia Muslim Twelve-Imami and a believer in Irans current system of governance. In October 2020, the Saker website courageously posts his articles. In doing so, the Saker serves as a witness.<br />These comments consider only the first three articles. The first article is titled, "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shia Islam: Iranian Revolution and Constitution, Part 1". The second article and third articles are "A Delegated System of Governance: Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shia Islam, Part 2 and Part 3". The third article finishes with a promise of more to come.<br />Despite this promise, these articles compose a cohesive critique, told through intertwining narratives.<br />Tajik describes the conditions which give rise to the Iranian revolt in 1979. In America, these same conditions ripen into Big Government (il)Liberalism and trigger the unanticipated election of a politically incorrect candidate, in 2016.<br />Persia turns away from her destiny as a satellite of the American Empire and sets upon a path to a form of governance that expresses the same relational structure as BG(il)L, but fills that relational structure with vastly different elements.<br />Is that surprising?<br />This same relational structure may be involved in a far deeper turning away, taking place over a thousand years ago. It is hard to say, but the suggestion cannot be denied. A foundational split occurs upon the death of Mohammed and its trace is found in the content-level normal context and potential in the interscope for the Iranian Republic. The content-level normal context and potential for American Big Government (il)Liberalism suggests how this historic trace may have come to be. A comparison of the two interscopes is instructive.<br />The associations in this commentary allows the reader to imagine a mystery, intrinsic to Mansoureh Tajiks discussion, yet invisible without the category-based nested form.</p>...1581438Comments on Mansoureh Tajiks Articles (2020) "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shia Islam"3939https://www.gandhi.com.mx/comments-on-mansoureh-tajik-s-articles-2020-understanding-the-concepts-of-imamat-and-wilayat-in-shi-a-islam-1/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/629281/63d2203f-cb39-47f6-a829-99144d2e12bf.jpg?v=638335571371300000InStockMXN99999DIEbook20209781942824947_W3siaWQiOiIzYjYyNTFmNC0xZmQ4LTRmYjEtOWIzZC1mYTM2ZWY1ZWNlMzciLCJsaXN0UHJpY2UiOjM5LCJkaXNjb3VudCI6MCwic2VsbGluZ1ByaWNlIjozOSwiaW5jbHVkZXNUYXgiOnRydWUsInByaWNlVHlwZSI6IklwcCIsImN1cnJlbmN5IjoiTVhOIiwiZnJvbSI6IjIwMjQtMDUtMjBUMTc6MDA6MDBaIiwicmVnaW9uIjoiTVgiLCJpc1ByZW9yZGVyIjpmYWxzZX1d9781942824947_<p>Mansoureh Tajik is a Shia Muslim Twelve-Imami and a believer in Irans current system of governance. In October 2020, the Saker website courageously posts his articles. In doing so, the Saker serves as a witness.<br />These comments consider only the first three articles. The first article is titled, Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shia Islam: Iranian Revolution and Constitution, Part 1. The second article and third articles are A Delegated System of Governance: Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shia Islam, Part 2 and Part 3. The third article finishes with a promise of more to come.<br />Despite this promise, these articles compose a cohesive critique, told through intertwining narratives.<br />Tajik describes the conditions which give rise to the Iranian revolt in 1979. In America, these same conditions ripen into Big Government (il)Liberalism and trigger the unanticipated election of a politically incorrect candidate, in 2016.<br />Persia turns away from her destiny as a satellite of the American Empire and sets upon a path to a form of governance that expresses the same relational structure as BG(il)L, but fills that relational structure with vastly different elements.<br />Is that surprising?<br />This same relational structure may be involved in a far deeper turning away, taking place over a thousand years ago. It is hard to say, but the suggestion cannot be denied. A foundational split occurs upon the death of Mohammed and its trace is found in the content-level normal context and potential in the interscope for the Iranian Republic. The content-level normal context and potential for American Big Government (il)Liberalism suggests how this historic trace may have come to be. A comparison of the two interscopes is instructive.<br />The associations in this commentary allows the reader to imagine a mystery, intrinsic to Mansoureh Tajiks discussion, yet invisible without the category-based nested form.</p>...(*_*)9781942824947_<p>Mansoureh Tajik is a Shia Muslim Twelve-Imami and a believer in Irans current system of governance. In October 2020, the Saker website courageously posts his articles. In doing so, the Saker serves as a witness.<br />These comments consider only the first three articles. The first article is titled, "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shia Islam: Iranian Revolution and Constitution, Part 1". The second article and third articles are "A Delegated System of Governance: Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shia Islam, Part 2 and Part 3". The third article finishes with a promise of more to come.<br />Despite this promise, these articles compose a cohesive critique, told through intertwining narratives.<br />Tajik describes the conditions which give rise to the Iranian revolt in 1979. In America, these same conditions ripen into Big Government (il)Liberalism and trigger the unanticipated election of a politically incorrect candidate, in 2016.<br />Persia turns away from her destiny as a satellite of the American Empire and sets upon a path to a form of governance that expresses the same relational structure as BG(il)L, but fills that relational structure with vastly different elements.<br />Is that surprising?<br />This same relational structure may be involved in a far deeper turning away, taking place over a thousand years ago. It is hard to say, but the suggestion cannot be denied. A foundational split occurs upon the death of Mohammed and its trace is found in the content-level normal context and potential in the interscope for the Iranian Republic. The content-level normal context and potential for American Big Government (il)Liberalism suggests how this historic trace may have come to be. A comparison of the two interscopes is instructive.<br />The associations in this commentary allows the reader to imagine a mystery, intrinsic to Mansoureh Tajiks discussion, yet invisible without the category-based nested form.</p>...9781942824947_Razie Mahlibro_electonico_43f412dc-2abd-38a3-963a-3c80bc4910cb_9781942824947;9781942824947_9781942824947Razie MahInglésMéxicohttps://getbook.kobo.com/koboid-prod-public/smashwords-epub-2cb8d9d7-7a55-4a78-8ce4-80c38f3656f9.epub2020-11-22T00:00:00+00:00Razie Mah