Envío gratis siempre a todo México.
Haz clic para hacer zoom
Not Available
James J.
Injury and Causation in Trade Remedy Law
Cargando comentarios…
Comparte
$3,252
$2,927
(IVA Incluido)
Envío gratis siempre
Comentarios
Cargando el resumen…
Cargando comentarios…
product
3599709Injury and Causation in Trade Remedy Lawhttps://www.gandhi.com.mx/injury-and-causation-in-trade-remedy-law-9789811021978/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/2995985/82e0a8fc-f2c2-4623-b78e-c598db8e69b8.jpg?v=63838473775073000029273252MXNSpringer Nature SingaporeInStock/Ebooks/<p>This book addresses injury and causation issues in the context of antidumping, countervailing duty (CVD) and safeguard investigations that are covered under the WTO. The book traces the origin and the negotiating history of injury and causation in trade remedy instruments and examines how this requirement evolved in the United States and more specifically in the GATT as part of the Kennedy Code, the Tokyo Codes and later the Uruguay Round negotiating texts. The book demonstrates that terms such as principal cause, substantial cause and a cause in and of itself are not necessarily warranted in such instruments. In the light of the experiences of key users of trade remedy instruments and the WTO Doha Round Rules negotiations, the book argues that causation determination does not require mathematical precision. Econometric or quantitative tools may be suggested, but such tools need not undermine the policy-laden nature of trade remedy instruments. Accordingly, the book suggests the use of weak-necessity and strong sufficiency test as a potentially viable causative framework with regard to injury and causation in trade remedies.</p>...3533993Injury and Causation in Trade Remedy Law29273252https://www.gandhi.com.mx/injury-and-causation-in-trade-remedy-law-9789811021978/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/2995985/82e0a8fc-f2c2-4623-b78e-c598db8e69b8.jpg?v=638384737750730000InStockMXN99999DIEbook20169789811021978_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_<p>This book addresses injury and causation issues in the context of antidumping, countervailing duty (CVD) and safeguard investigations that are covered under the WTO. The book traces the origin and the negotiating history of injury and causation in trade remedy instruments and examines how this requirement evolved in the United States and more specifically in the GATT as part of the Kennedy Code, the Tokyo Codes and later the Uruguay Round negotiating texts. The book demonstrates that terms such as principal cause, substantial cause and a cause in and of itself are not necessarily warranted in such instruments. In the light of the experiences of key users of trade remedy instruments and the WTO Doha Round Rules negotiations, the book argues that causation determination does not require mathematical precision. Econometric or quantitative tools may be suggested, but such tools need not undermine the policy-laden nature of trade remedy instruments. Accordingly, the book suggests the use of weak-necessity and strong sufficiency test as a potentially viable causative framework with regard to injury and causation in trade remedies.</p>(*_*)9789811021978_<p>This book addresses injury and causation issues in the context of antidumping, countervailing duty (CVD) and safeguard investigations that are covered under the WTO. The book traces the origin and the negotiating history of injury and causation in trade remedy instruments and examines how this requirement evolved in the United States and more specifically in the GATT as part of the Kennedy Code, the Tokyo Codes and later the Uruguay Round negotiating texts. The book demonstrates that terms such as principal cause, substantial cause and a cause in and of itself are not necessarily warranted in such instruments. In the light of the experiences of key users of trade remedy instruments and the WTO Doha Round Rules negotiations, the book argues that causation determination does not require mathematical precision. Econometric or quantitative tools may be suggested, but such tools need not undermine the policy-laden nature of trade remedy instruments. Accordingly, the book suggests the use of weak-necessity and strong sufficiency test as a potentially viable causative framework with regard to injury and causation in trade remedies.</p>...9789811021978_Springer Nature Singaporelibro_electonico_69d6707b-0c4f-3065-88ef-6481c8ac05b0_9789811021978;9789811021978_9789811021978James J.InglésMéxico2016-11-25T00:00:00+00:00Springer Nature Singapore