Envío gratis siempre a todo México.
Haz clic para hacer zoom
Not Available
Anonymous .
Ironie -Theorie und Praxis
Cargando comentarios…
Comparte
$87
(IVA Incluido)
Envío gratis siempre
Comentarios
Cargando el resumen…
Cargando comentarios…
product
3450191Ironie -Theorie und Praxishttps://www.gandhi.com.mx/ironie--theorie-und-praxis-9783638686440/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/3743712/e906b83c-6771-416d-add2-43381ac1f3b1.jpg?v=6383858096484000008787MXNGRIN PublishingInStock/Ebooks/<p>Seminar paper from the year 2005 in the subject German Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,3, Humboldt-University of Berlin, 8 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In this paper, I want to explore the accounts of irony given by Wilson and Sperber, Blakemore, and Clark. Wilson and Sperber formulated a theory of irony that has been commented on by almost every theorist of irony that came after them. Their notion that irony is echoing interpretive use of language is taken up and modified by Blakemore, who adds further components derived from the concept of weak implicature. The breach between Clarks and Blakemores account of irony is wider than that between the accounts of Sperber and Wilson and Blakemore. Clark introduces a new focus on irony, stressing the fact that every ironical utterance is a joint pretense that requires some sort of coordination of the speakers and the hearers actions. The descriptions of Sperber and Wilson, Blakemore, and Clark will each be followed by a discussion of their theses in which I will focus on the problems that seem unresolved by the respective theory. I begin with an account and a subsequent short discussion of theories of irony from Cicero to Grice to Sperber and Wilson. [...]</p>...3386147Ironie -Theorie und Praxis8787https://www.gandhi.com.mx/ironie--theorie-und-praxis-9783638686440/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/3743712/e906b83c-6771-416d-add2-43381ac1f3b1.jpg?v=638385809648400000InStockMXN99999DIEbook20079783638686440_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_<p>Seminar paper from the year 2005 in the subject German Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,3, Humboldt-University of Berlin, 8 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In this paper, I want to explore the accounts of irony given by Wilson and Sperber, Blakemore, and Clark. Wilson and Sperber formulated a theory of irony that has been commented on by almost every theorist of irony that came after them. Their notion that irony is echoing interpretive use of language is taken up and modified by Blakemore, who adds further components derived from the concept of weak implicature. The breach between Clarks and Blakemores account of irony is wider than that between the accounts of Sperber and Wilson and Blakemore. Clark introduces a new focus on irony, stressing the fact that every ironical utterance is a joint pretense that requires some sort of coordination of the speakers and the hearers actions. The descriptions of Sperber and Wilson, Blakemore, and Clark will each be followed by a discussion of their theses in which I will focus on the problems that seem unresolved by the respective theory. I begin with an account and a subsequent short discussion of theories of irony from Cicero to Grice to Sperber and Wilson. ...</p>(*_*)9783638686440_<p>Seminar paper from the year 2005 in the subject German Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,3, Humboldt-University of Berlin, 8 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In this paper, I want to explore the accounts of irony given by Wilson and Sperber, Blakemore, and Clark. Wilson and Sperber formulated a theory of irony that has been commented on by almost every theorist of irony that came after them. Their notion that irony is echoing interpretive use of language is taken up and modified by Blakemore, who adds further components derived from the concept of weak implicature. The breach between Clarks and Blakemores account of irony is wider than that between the accounts of Sperber and Wilson and Blakemore. Clark introduces a new focus on irony, stressing the fact that every ironical utterance is a joint pretense that requires some sort of coordination of the speakers and the hearers actions. The descriptions of Sperber and Wilson, Blakemore, and Clark will each be followed by a discussion of their theses in which I will focus on the problems that seem unresolved by the respective theory. I begin with an account and a subsequent short discussion of theories of irony from Cicero to Grice to Sperber and Wilson. [...]</p>...9783638686440_GRIN Publishinglibro_electonico_810211e7-da3f-4b58-9771-e5c553bf47e2_9783638686440;9783638686440_9783638686440Anonymous .InglésMéxicohttps://getbook.kobo.com/koboid-prod-public/ciando-epub-6e6bc664-0bd0-4b2f-bc1d-a4a43d71c4e3.epub2007-04-16T00:00:00+00:00GRIN Publishing