Envío gratis siempre a todo México.
Haz clic para hacer zoom
Not Available
Progressive Management
Maritime Improvised Explosive Devices: A Threat Based Technology Study - Use of MIEDs by Terrorists and the Navy's Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) C
Cargando comentarios…
Comparte
$173
Envío gratis siempre
Comentarios
Cargando el resumen…
Cargando comentarios…
product
1621069Maritime Improvised Explosive Devices: A Threat Based Technology Study - Use of MIEDs by Terrorists and the Navy's Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Chttps://www.gandhi.com.mx/maritime-improvised-explosive-devices-a-threat-based-technology-study-use-of-mieds-by-terrorists-and-the-navy-s-explosive-ordnance-disposal-eod-capability-to-counter-with-divers-and-robots-1/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/372100/324e8aab-6b23-450d-b668-1112ff6e24e8.jpg?v=638334432977470000173173MXNProgressive ManagementInStock/Ebooks/<p>This excellent report has been professionally converted for accurate flowing-text e-book format reproduction.<br />Over the last thirteen years, the world saw an increased use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) by violent extremists and terrorist groups. Due to the simplicity and availability of IED making material, any willing person with limited knowledge can make IEDs. Given that the surface of the earth is eighty percent water, the maritime environment is a likely threat domain for terrorist activities. Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) has the sole capability in the Department of Defense (DOD) for countering the maritime improvised explosive device (MIED) tactical threat to United States national interests and security. EOD divers, with limited equipment, are still the primary resource to render safe the waterborne explosive threat. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan proved that robotics and unmanned tools are essential to EOD operations ashore for safety and standoff from IEDs. Unfortunately, use of robotics in the maritime environment for EOD operations is relatively new and unproven. The primary thesis question is: How can Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal counter the MIED threat in the contemporary operational environment? This thesis identifies a capability gap in safely countering MIEDs and recommends a materiel solution in closing the gap.</p><p>CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Maritime Improvised Explosive Devices: A Maritime Threat Research Question Personal Qualifications Assumptions Terms and Definitions Limitations Scope and Delimitations Significance of Study Summary and Conclusion CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW Organization Background and Threat Policy U.S. Navy EOD Mission U.S. Navy EOD Current Technology The Perceived Capability Gap and Potential Solutions U.S. Navy EOD Robotic Future Summary and Conclusion CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Method Defining the Problem Data Collection Description, Analysis, and Interpretation Description Analysis Interpretation Summary and Conclusion CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS Organization and Purpose The MIED Threat and the Presence of a Capability Gap Remaining Secondary Research Questions Doctrine Organization Training Materiel Reviewing the Capability Gap Analysis of a Robotic Solution to C-MIED Summary and Conclusion CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Organization and Purpose Recommendations Future Studies Conclusion APPENDIX A CONTEMPORARY MIED ATTACKS REFERENC1598953Maritime Improvised Explosive Devices: A Threat Based Technology Study - Use of MIEDs by Terrorists and the Navy's Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) C173173https://www.gandhi.com.mx/maritime-improvised-explosive-devices-a-threat-based-technology-study-use-of-mieds-by-terrorists-and-the-navy-s-explosive-ordnance-disposal-eod-capability-to-counter-with-divers-and-robots-1/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/372100/324e8aab-6b23-450d-b668-1112ff6e24e8.jpg?v=638334432977470000InStockMXN99999DIEbook20189781370095001_W3siaWQiOiIyM2FlNWQ1Ni0xNWU1LTRiMGItYWVmYS04ODdmMDU0YmU4NDUiLCJsaXN0UHJpY2UiOjE3MywiZGlzY291bnQiOjAsInNlbGxpbmdQcmljZSI6MTczLCJpbmNsdWRlc1RheCI6dHJ1ZSwicHJpY2VUeXBlIjoiSXBwIiwiY3VycmVuY3kiOiJNWE4iLCJmcm9tIjoiMjAyNC0wNS0xOFQyMDowMDowMFoiLCJyZWdpb24iOiJNWCIsImlzUHJlb3JkZXIiOmZhbHNlfV0=9781370095001_<p>This excellent report has been professionally converted for accurate flowing-text e-book format reproduction.<br />Over the last thirteen years, the world saw an increased use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) by violent extremists and terrorist groups. Due to the simplicity and availability of IED making material, any willing person with limited knowledge can make IEDs. Given that the surface of the earth is eighty percent water, the maritime environment is a likely threat domain for terrorist activities. Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) has the sole capability in the Department of Defense (DOD) for countering the maritime improvised explosive device (MIED) tactical threat to United States national interests and security. EOD divers, with limited equipment, are still the primary resource to render safe the waterborne explosive threat. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan proved that robotics and unmanned tools are essential to EOD operations ashore for safety and standoff from IEDs. Unfortunately, use of robotics in the maritime environment for EOD operations is relatively new and unproven. The primary thesis question is: How can Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal counter the MIED threat in the contemporary operational environment? This thesis identifies a capability gap in safely countering MIEDs and recommends a materiel solution in closing the gap.</p><p>CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Maritime Improvised Explosive Devices: A Maritime Threat Research Question Personal Qualifications Assumptions Terms and Definitions Limitations Scope and Delimitations Significance of Study Summary and Conclusion CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW Organization Background and Threat Policy U.S. Navy EOD Mission U.S. Navy EOD Current Technology The Perceived Capability Gap and Potential Solutions U.S. Navy EOD Robotic Future Summary and Conclusion CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Method Defining the Problem Data Collection Description, Analysis, and Interpretation Description Analysis Interpretation Summary and Conclusion CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS Organization and Purpose The MIED Threat and the Presence of a Capability Gap Remaining Secondary Research Questions Doctrine Organization Training Materiel Reviewing the Capability Gap Analysis of a Robotic Solution to C-MIED Summary and Conclusion CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Organization and Purpose Recommendations Future Studies Conclusion APPENDIX A CONTEMPORARY MIED ATTACKS REFERENCE LIST</p>...(*_*)9781370095001_<p>This excellent report has been professionally converted for accurate flowing-text e-book format reproduction.<br />Over the last thirteen years, the world saw an increased use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) by violent extremists and terrorist groups. Due to the simplicity and availability of IED making material, any willing person with limited knowledge can make IEDs. Given that the surface of the earth is eighty percent water, the maritime environment is a likely threat domain for terrorist activities. Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) has the sole capability in the Department of Defense (DOD) for countering the maritime improvised explosive device (MIED) tactical threat to United States national interests and security. EOD divers, with limited equipment, are still the primary resource to render safe the waterborne explosive threat. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan proved that robotics and unmanned tools are essential to EOD operations ashore for safety and standoff from IEDs. Unfortunately, use of robotics in the maritime environment for EOD operations is relatively new and unproven. The primary thesis question is: "How can Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal counter the MIED threat in the contemporary operational environment?" This thesis identifies a capability gap in safely countering MIEDs and recommends a materiel solution in closing the gap.</p><p>CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Maritime Improvised Explosive Devices: A Maritime Threat Research Question Personal Qualifications Assumptions Terms and Definitions Limitations Scope and Delimitations Significance of Study Summary and Conclusion CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW Organization Background and Threat Policy U.S. Navy EOD Mission U.S. Navy EOD Current Technology The Perceived Capability Gap and Potential Solutions U.S. Navy EOD Robotic Future Summary and Conclusion CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Method Defining the Problem Data Collection Description, Analysis, and Interpretation Description Analysis Interpretation Summary and Conclusion CHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS Organization and Purpose The MIED Threat and the Presence of a Capability Gap Remaining Secondary Research Questions Doctrine Organization Training Materiel Reviewing the Capability Gap Analysis of a Robotic Solution to C-MIED Summary and Conclusion CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Organization and Purpose Recommendations Future Studies Conclusion APPENDIX A CONTEMPORARY MIED ATTACKS REFERENCE LIST</p>...9781370095001_Progressive Managementlibro_electonico_9ab4e7c8-3dc8-3388-bb7b-be91a5d775f6_9781370095001;9781370095001_9781370095001Progressive ManagementInglésMéxicohttps://getbook.kobo.com/koboid-prod-public/smashwords-epub-a10b21f6-2e33-4f26-ace7-c98c4eef597b.epub2018-05-09T00:00:00+00:00Progressive Management