'Every claim the West does not like standard of scrutiny the West rarely applies to itself. What happens when the criteria used in any other field of rational inquiry is applied on the official story of September 11th?

This book does not ask you to believe a theory. It asks you to apply the rules of evidence you already believe in — the same rules Western academia and public discourse demand of Islamic history, of religious testimony, of any contested claim — to the evidence surrounding 9/11 itself. What emerges is not a single clean narrative, but a record fractured by contradiction: officials who told two different stories under oath, numerous things that happened that day that have not happened before or since ,evidence destroyed before it could be examined, a commission underfunded and structurally compromised from the start, and a government whose own documented history of deception in moments of comparable motive has never been given the weight it deserves.

Written by a Muslim author for both Muslims and non-Muslims who are interested in the truth of the events that happened that day.The result is an investigation that treats its readers as capable of weighing evidence for themselves, and asks nothing more than that the same standard applied everywhere else finally be applied here too.'

Same Standard, Different Verdict: An Investigation Into 9/11

Comentarios