Envío gratis siempre a todo México.
Haz clic para hacer zoom
Not Available
Michael Abiodun
SECURITY RIGHTS IN THE WAKE OF MODERN TERRORISM
Cargando comentarios…
Comparte
Comentarios
Cargando el resumen…
Cargando comentarios…
product
2524809SECURITY RIGHTS IN THE WAKE OF MODERN TERRORISMhttps://www.gandhi.com.mx/security-rights-in-the-wake-of-modern-terrorism-1230005186822/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/2122379/1f4b9dfd-704f-43c8-8365-70ce1a84fcc7.jpg?v=638383539862700000500500MXNGrecian LimitedInStock/Ebooks/2461443SECURITY RIGHTS IN THE WAKE OF MODERN TERRORISM500500https://www.gandhi.com.mx/security-rights-in-the-wake-of-modern-terrorism-1230005186822/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/2122379/1f4b9dfd-704f-43c8-8365-70ce1a84fcc7.jpg?v=638383539862700000InStockMXN99999DIEbook20211230005186822_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1230005186822_<p>Surely, facts cannot disagree with the view that modern and international terrorism did not begin with the 2001, September 11 attacks in the U.S. But it was from the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Centre in 2001 that international terrorism took a different complexion, gained greater global consciousness, evolved a massive deflection from common sense and turned a deaf ear to good sense and humanism. And until now, perpetrators of modern international terrorism (both state and non-state actors) are yet to turn in the direction of reason.</p><p>Terrorism as a special brand of criminality requires approaches of serious specialty. The absence of recourse to the path of reason (which is the choice of perpetrators of terrorism) is a recourse and a path which the combaters against the enemy of humanity and the defenders of mankind must not fail to follow. For the non-followership of the path of reason will pave the way for an undesired result yet unknown to the annals of man.</p><p>The immediate and the long term implication of this non-followership is that the war against terrorism will in the end fulfill the interests of terrorists except the it is pursued with the interests of a specially configured double-edge instrument of the nature of both a sword and a shield the combat weapon and the defense mechanism where the security of lives and property is insured on the one hand and human rights and fundamental freedoms are ensured on the other.</p><p>Unquestionably, terrorism is a global institution whose trade thrives in spreading strife between the smooth and complementary relationship between security and human rights. Its utmost aim therefore is not to further the bridging of this relationship but it rather seeks to break it, thereby creating an asymmetric balance in that complementary relationship. Asymmetric balance triggered by terrorism scores only one horrid point; it is the horrid point of effecting unneeded trade-offs between sustained security rights and the safeguards of human rights during exceptional times.</p><p>Finally, the legal experiences of six jurisdictions namely, the U.K., the U.S., Canada, Germany, South Africa and Nigeria spanning the years from 2000 to 2020 forms an integral parts of this book. Significant references to global axis such as the Arab League, the African Commission, the African charter, numerous international instruments, India and a few European states and the E.U. have been assigned equal considerations in this book.</p><p>Essentially, how the legal jurisprudences of these states and axis have responded to the scourge of terrorism and the engendered conflict between security and human rights is also the focal address of this book.</p>(*_*)1230005186822_<p>Surely, facts cannot disagree with the view that modern and international terrorism did not begin with the 2001, September 11 attacks in the U.S. But it was from the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon and the World Trade Centre in 2001 that international terrorism took a different complexion, gained greater global consciousness, evolved a massive deflection from common sense and turned a deaf ear to good sense and humanism. And until now, perpetrators of modern international terrorism (both state and non-state actors) are yet to turn in the direction of reason.</p><p>Terrorism as a special brand of criminality requires approaches of serious specialty. The absence of recourse to the path of reason (which is the choice of perpetrators of terrorism) is a recourse and a path which the combaters against the enemy of humanity and the defenders of mankind must not fail to follow. For the non-followership of the path of reason will pave the way for an undesired result yet unknown to the annals of man.</p><p>The immediate and the long term implication of this non-followership is that the war against terrorism will in the end fulfill the interests of terrorists except the it is pursued with the interests of a specially configured double-edge instrument of the nature of both a sword and a shield the combat weapon and the defense mechanism where the security of lives and property is insured on the one hand and human rights and fundamental freedoms are ensured on the other.</p><p>Unquestionably, terrorism is a global institution whose trade thrives in spreading strife between the smooth and complementary relationship between security and human rights. Its utmost aim therefore is not to further the bridging of this relationship but it rather seeks to break it, thereby creating an asymmetric balance in that complementary relationship. Asymmetric balance triggered by terrorism scores only one horrid point; it is the horrid point of effecting unneeded trade-offs between sustained security rights and the safeguards of human rights during exceptional times.</p><p>Finally, the legal experiences of six jurisdictions namely, the U.K., the U.S., Canada, Germany, South Africa and Nigeria spanning the years from 2000 to 2020 forms an integral parts of this book. Significant references to global axis such as the Arab League, the African Commission, the African charter, numerous international instruments, India and a few European states and the E.U. have been assigned equal considerations in this book.</p><p>Essentially, how the legal jurisprudences of these states and axis have responded to the scourge of terrorism and the engendered conflict between security and human rights is also the focal address of this book.</p>...1230005186822_Grecian Limitedlibro_electonico_0b3b8519-6b5c-33dc-a57a-1f54eaa99d76_1230005186822;1230005186822_1230005186822Michael AbiodunInglésMéxicohttps://getbook.kobo.com/koboid-prod-public/d1db4e52-8bfb-40fc-8924-0e79ac703ae0-epub-2aff7251-bf90-44aa-aeae-54774cee6b02.epub2021-09-29T00:00:00+00:00Grecian Limited