product
3941572Sub-State Governance through Territorial Autonomyhttps://www.gandhi.com.mx/sub-state-governance-through-territorial-autonomy-9783642200489/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/3488319/cc670494-6fbe-4a84-bef0-1e52642f8428.jpg?v=63838544493260000027323036MXNSpringer Berlin HeidelbergInStock/Ebooks/<p>This study focuses on territorial autonomy, which is often used in different conflict-resolution and minority situations. Four typical elements are identified on the basis of the historical example of the Memel Territory and the so-called Memel case of the PCIJ; distribution of powers, participation through elections and referendums, executive power of territorial autonomy, and international relations. These elements are used for a comparative analysis of the constitutional law that regulates the position of six currently existing special jurisdictions, the land Islands in Finalnd, Scotland in the United Kingdom, Puerto Rico in the United States of America, Hong Kong in China, Aceh in Indonesia and Zanzibar in Tanzania. The current sub-state entities examined can be arranged in relation to Memel in a manner that indicates that Hong Kong and the land conform to the typical territorial autonomy, while Puerto Rico and Aceh should probably not be understood as territorial autonomies proper. At the same time, the territorial autonomies can be distinguished from federally organized sub-state entities.</p>...3877748Sub-State Governance through Territorial Autonomy27323036https://www.gandhi.com.mx/sub-state-governance-through-territorial-autonomy-9783642200489/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/3488319/cc670494-6fbe-4a84-bef0-1e52642f8428.jpg?v=638385444932600000InStockMXN99999DIEbook20119783642200489_W3siaWQiOiJkNGM2MDNjZC0zY2M0LTQ4YTQtYmVlZi1kYjE2OGM5MThkZWIiLCJsaXN0UHJpY2UiOjI5MDUsImRpc2NvdW50IjoyOTAsInNlbGxpbmdQcmljZSI6MjYxNSwiaW5jbHVkZXNUYXgiOnRydWUsInByaWNlVHlwZSI6Ildob2xlc2FsZSIsImN1cnJlbmN5IjoiTVhOIiwiZnJvbSI6IjIwMjQtMTEtMDhUMjA6MDA6MDBaIiwidG8iOiIyMDI0LTExLTMwVDIzOjU5OjU5WiIsInJlZ2lvbiI6Ik1YIiwiaXNQcmVvcmRlciI6ZmFsc2V9LHsiaWQiOiJjMjY0ZjJhYS02NGI0LTQ0ZGYtYWNjMy00ZGMxODEzN2I3NDEiLCJsaXN0UHJpY2UiOjMwMjEsImRpc2NvdW50IjozMDIsInNlbGxpbmdQcmljZSI6MjcxOSwiaW5jbHVkZXNUYXgiOnRydWUsInByaWNlVHlwZSI6Ildob2xlc2FsZSIsImN1cnJlbmN5IjoiTVhOIiwiZnJvbSI6IjIwMjQtMTItMDFUMDA6MDA6MDBaIiwicmVnaW9uIjoiTVgiLCJpc1ByZW9yZGVyIjpmYWxzZX1d9783642200489_<p>This study focuses on territorial autonomy, which is often used in different conflict-resolution and minority situations. Four typical elements are identified on the basis of the historical example of the Memel Territory and the so-called Memel case of the PCIJ; distribution of powers, participation through elections and referendums, executive power of territorial autonomy, and international relations. These elements are used for a comparative analysis of the constitutional law that regulates the position of six currently existing special jurisdictions, the land Islands in Finalnd, Scotland in the United Kingdom, Puerto Rico in the United States of America, Hong Kong in China, Aceh in Indonesia and Zanzibar in Tanzania. The current sub-state entities examined can be arranged in relation to Memel in a manner that indicates that Hong Kong and the land conform to the typical territorial autonomy, while Puerto Rico and Aceh should probably not be understood as territorial autonomies proper. At the same time, the territorial autonomies can be distinguished from federally organized sub-state entities.</p>9783642200489_Springer Berlin Heidelberglibro_electonico_243f3f0a-58f5-34f0-b9f2-e0c84815e236_9783642200489;9783642200489_9783642200489Markku SuksiInglésMéxico2011-07-17T00:00:00+00:00Springer Berlin Heidelberg