Envío gratis siempre a todo México.
Haz clic para hacer zoom
Not Available
James Constant
The Gravitational Probe B Boondoggle
Cargando comentarios…
Comparte
$112
Envío gratis siempre
Comentarios
Cargando el resumen…
Cargando comentarios…
product
1487321The Gravitational Probe B Boondogglehttps://www.gandhi.com.mx/the-gravitational-probe-b-boondoggle-1/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/1312029/e2dfae80-77eb-4534-a143-50cd1f8ed594.jpg?v=638337844940870000112112MXNJames ConstantInStock/Ebooks/<p>Einsteins theory, in its so called weak gravity field linearized version, approximately reduces to Newtons theory. Conflicting linearizations depend on their authors and, are heavily mathematical, involve non-physical geometrical concepts, and rely on Newtonian type tests and results. For example, Einsteins theory does not inform us how, absent force, his warped geometry might actuate Newtons gyroscope. Basically, Einstein tells us that one can ignore Newtons predictions based on Newtons force F but, nevertheless, use Newtons force F and gyroscope to prove his predictions based on weak fields approximating Newtons theory with different equations proposed by different authors. Einsteins theory, and predictions, cannot be confirmed with tests using Newtons force F, and gyroscope. And, they cannot be confirmed when equations are manipulated by their authors. Which set of Einsteins theory predictions is correct? Incredibly, the science community accepts Einsteins theory which relies on Delphic metaphysical equations linearized to approximate Newtons theory and a handful of tests based essentially on Newtons theory. There are many detractors.</p>...1471202The Gravitational Probe B Boondoggle112112https://www.gandhi.com.mx/the-gravitational-probe-b-boondoggle-1/phttps://gandhi.vtexassets.com/arquivos/ids/1312029/e2dfae80-77eb-4534-a143-50cd1f8ed594.jpg?v=638337844940870000InStockMXN99999DIEbook20159781311607263_W3siaWQiOiI0MTJmOWI3Yy0xY2IyLTRiMjctYjkzMS1lODY3ZWZjMWY4NGEiLCJsaXN0UHJpY2UiOjExMiwiZGlzY291bnQiOjAsInNlbGxpbmdQcmljZSI6MTEyLCJpbmNsdWRlc1RheCI6dHJ1ZSwicHJpY2VUeXBlIjoiSXBwIiwiY3VycmVuY3kiOiJNWE4iLCJmcm9tIjoiMjAyNC0wNS0xN1QxNTowMDowMFoiLCJyZWdpb24iOiJNWCIsImlzUHJlb3JkZXIiOmZhbHNlfV0=9781311607263_<p>Einsteins theory, in its so called weak gravity field linearized version, approximately reduces to Newtons theory. Conflicting linearizations depend on their authors and, are heavily mathematical, involve non-physical geometrical concepts, and rely on Newtonian type tests and results. For example, Einsteins theory does not inform us how, absent force, his warped geometry might actuate Newtons gyroscope. Basically, Einstein tells us that one can ignore Newtons predictions based on Newtons force F but, nevertheless, use Newtons force F and gyroscope to prove his predictions based on weak fields approximating Newtons theory with different equations proposed by different authors. Einsteins theory, and predictions, cannot be confirmed with tests using Newtons force F, and gyroscope. And, they cannot be confirmed when equations are manipulated by their authors. Which set of Einsteins theory predictions is correct? Incredibly, the science community accepts Einsteins theory which relies on Delphic metaphysical equations linearized to approximate Newtons theory and a handful of tests based essentially on Newtons theory. There are many detractors.</p>...9781311607263_James Constantlibro_electonico_5f781714-3ae1-3b40-bcd6-a0a988368dcd_9781311607263;9781311607263_9781311607263James ConstantInglésMéxicohttps://getbook.kobo.com/koboid-prod-public/smashwords-epub-4a39b1aa-2641-4e2a-ac81-1356b09ce2c8.epub2015-01-27T00:00:00+00:00James Constant